Thomas friedman the world is flat essay
LinksIt is now possible for more people than ever to collaborate and compete in real time with more people on more different kinds of work from more different corners of the planet and on a more equal footing than at any previous time in the history of the world.— Thomas L. FriedmanThe World Is Flat. FriedmanPhase one lasted until 1800, when the world was run by states.
Then, between 1800 and 2000, phase two saw the rise of multinational corporations. The third phase of globalization, in place since the year 2000 and continuing into the foreseeable future, is distinguished by individuals seeking to take control of their economic destiny.That, in a nutshell, is the thesis of The World Is Flat, first published in 2005.
Friedman emphasizes the status of America today in relation to the other countries of the world. As I looked at the things in which he warned about or highlighted, I realized the importance of this issue. He talks about a few aspects in which need to be kept competitive in order for America to retain their current standing in the world market.First of all, Friedman talks about the different levels of globalization.
There are 3 different time periods in which the society has differed and changed, bringing us to where we are today. Globalization 1.0, which took place from 1492 to 1800, was the first step to making the world flatter. The coming to America, and the industrial drive that came along with this is what most characterized globalization 1.0The book, The World is Flat, by Thomas Friedman draws attention to some very good points concerning globalization and the world economy today.
The coming to America, and the industrial drive that came along with this is what most characterized globalization 1.0ASSIGNMENT: The World Is Flat by Thomas L. According to Friedman, the uniqueness of the current situation lies in the fact that for the first time in human history, individuals and small groups of people have obtained the opportunity to collaborate and compete in the global market as full-fledged producers and consumers of goods and services, while previously, globalization was basing mostly on states and later, on corporations (Friedman 35-).
Stiglitz wrote in The New York Times reviewing The World Is Flat in 2005. In this new edition, Thomas L. Friedman includes fresh stories and insights to help us understand the flattening of the world. It was a bit of a long book. Well, I read a lot of other things since then and now. The book has opened my eyes to the situation America is in, that the world is in.First, you must understand what he means when he says the world is flat.
Friedman About Iraq, Putin and IsraelRead the New York Times review of That Used to Be Us. Please help to improve this article by introducing more precise citations. (October 201) ( Learn how and when to remove this template message)The World Is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-first Century. Friedman that analyzes globalization, primarily in the early 21st century. The title is a metaphor for viewing the world as a level playing field in terms of commerce, wherein all competitors have an equal opportunity.
The World Is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-first CenturyOriginal 1st edition coverAuthorThomas L. It is called the world if flat because it is actually a metaphor for looking at the world as a level playing field in terms of business where all of the competitors have equal opportunities. In this book, Friedman talks about ten different factors that play an important role in explaining why exactly the world is flat. This event marked the end of the end of the Cold War, which in turn permitted people from the other side of the wall to join the economic mainstream.
Accounting EssaysAdmission EssaysAnalysis EssaysArt EssaysBiography EssaysBiology EssaysBook Review EssaysBusiness EssaysCase Studies EssaysCause and Effect EssaysCharacter Analysis EssaysCommunication EssaysCommunication and Media EssaysCompute Technologies EssaysConsideration EssaysControversial EssaysDescription EssaysEconomics EssaysEducation EssaysEvaluation EssaysExplanation EssaysHistory EssaysJob EssaysLaw EssaysManagement EssaysMedicine EssaysMusic EssaysPersonal EssaysPersonal Experience EssaysPersuasive EssaysPersuasive Speech EssaysPhilosophy EssaysPolitical science EssaysPolitics EssaysProposal EssaysPsychology EssaysReflective EssaysReligion EssaysResearloved the book From Beirut to Jerusalem by Thomas Friedman (1998) when I read it (at the time).
After that, I enthusiastically bought and read his The lexus and the olive tree. I got something from that book but not a whole lot. When The world is flat came out, I read an extended essay which he put out in the The New York Times and chose to skip the book. I never read management gurus.Today, I read a marvellous essay on the book by Edward Leamer which is forthcoming in Journal of Economic Literature.
Much unlike Thomas Friedman, it is actually insightful and (atleast for me) said new things about globalisation other than the obvious insights of gains from trade based on diminishing frictions. He had the Nina, the Pinta and the Santa Maria. I knew just which direction I was going. I went east.